TechnologyWebsite BuildersWordPress Hosting

Core Web Vitals Data Study w/ CrUX & 5.2M Pages

Core Web Vitals (CWV) are the velocity metrics a part of Google’s Web page Expertise indicators used to measure person expertise. The metrics measure visible load with Largest Contentful Paint (LCP), visible stability with Cumulative Structure Shift (CLS), and interactivity with First Enter Delay (FID).

We wished to have a look at the info to see how web sites have been doing and if we may glean any essential insights.

The info we used is from the Chrome Person Expertise Report (CrUX), which is the supply of Core Web Vitals information and is information from precise Chrome customers.

Within the public dataset, the info is aggregated on the origin (area) stage. We additionally wished to have a look at page-level information, so we pulled over 5.2M pages with Core Web Vitals info in Ahrefs’ Web site Audit.


Let’s dig in.

CrUX Data

Total, we noticed practically 33% of internet sites passing Core Web Vitals thresholds. That is up ~10% from the earlier yr, indicating that web sites are getting quicker.

Share of internet sites passing Core Web Vitals thresholds.


The enhancements are comparable on desktop and cell. Many of the focus in 2021 was on cell outcomes. However typically, bettering velocity on cell pages additionally improves velocity on desktop pages.

Graph showing percentage of good Core Web Vitals by device

Core Web Vitals enchancment by gadget.

Web sites appear to be making progress on bettering FID and CLS, however they’re fighting LCP. I’m not likely stunned by this. LCP has essentially the most parts, making it the toughest to repair.


Graph showing percentage of good FID, LCP, and CLS over time

Share of fine FID, LCP, and CLS over time.

Web sites appear to battle a bit extra with LCP on cell in comparison with desktop. It’s probably due to the connection velocity and cell CPUs having much less processing energy.

For FID, it seems to be like virtually nobody wants to fret about this metric on their desktop variations, and only a few have to deal with this metric typically.

CLS is comparable on cell and desktop.

Graph showing breakdown of LCP, FID, and CLS by device

Additional breakdown of LCP, FID, and CLS by gadget.

Once you break down Core Web Vitals by connection velocity, virtually no websites on 3G or slower connections are passing. If a lot of your customers are on slower connections or the web in your nation is slower, you’ll be combating an uphill battle.

Graph showing percentage of good Core Web Vitals by connection

Passing Core Web Vitals by connection sort.

Right here’s one other method of wanting on the information with the person metrics damaged down by connection velocity. The LCP threshold appears virtually unattainable to go on slower connections.

Graph showing breakdown of LCP by connection type

Breakdown of LCP by connection sort.

Few websites want to fret about FID, even on slower connections.

Graph showing breakdown of FID by connection type

Breakdown of FID by connection sort.

Many websites battle with CLS on slower connections.

Graph showing breakdown of CLS by connection type

Breakdown of CLS by connection sort.

The situation of your customers appears to have a big effect. Completely different nations have completely different gadget preferences and completely different community infrastructures. In case your customers are in a rustic the place everybody makes use of desktop units with quick web, your web site will extra probably have good Core Web Vitals. The alternative is probably going true for web sites whose customers are all utilizing older telephones and on slower connections.

2 tables side by side. Left table shows 10 best countries for CWV with corresponding percentage of good CWV. Right shows 10 worst countries for CWV with corresponding percentage of good CWV

The U.S. is thirty eighth within the information with a 41% passing price. In case you’re curious, right here’s the full country data for August 2021.

Web site Audit information

A fast because of Oleksiy Golovko for gathering this information from Ahrefs’ Web site Audit. He pulled information from 43.66M distinctive pages. We discovered solely 5.21M (~11.9%) had at the very least one Core Web Vitals metric, and 93% of these (or ~4.85M complete) had all three metrics.

We additionally famous all the pages had LCP (99.79%) and CLS (99.91%) metrics. The metric, FID, was lacking essentially the most and solely out there on 93.08% of pages that had any Core Web Vitals metrics.

Fewer pages than total origins (domains) are passing Core Web Vitals (solely 21.2% of pages passing). I’m unsure easy methods to account for this totally. I think it could be resulting from caching the place secondary web page masses are usually quicker.

For page-level information, LCP is much like the origin information. FID is healthier and one thing that doesn’t appear to be a priority for many pages. CLS is worse within the page-level information than the origin information.

Graph showing breakdown of CWV, LCP, FID, and CLS at the page level

Breakdown of page-level Core Web Vitals, together with LCP, FID, and CLS.

Last ideas

I wished to check the affect of Core Web Vitals on rankings. However as a result of timing of the rollout and different updates that occurred on the identical time, I don’t assume there’s a great methodology that’s conclusive. There are different research that present a correlation between velocity enhancements and rankings. However saying this isn’t that completely different from saying websites which are extra prone to work on their web optimization additionally rank higher than those who don’t.

If you wish to file Core Web Vitals information to your web site whilst you make enhancements, you’ll be able to allow the choice within the Web site Audit settings. All customers, together with free customers, have entry to this through Ahrefs Webmaster Instruments.

In case you’re having hassle bettering your metrics or wish to be taught extra about how pages load, take a look at our web page velocity information.

What information stunned you essentially the most? What information will you wish to see if we replace this research? Let me know on Twitter.

Show More

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *